This collective work aims to analyze main structural human organization inconsistencies and to extract some improvement principles to make the human species stronger and more relevant, for the whole Living on Earth and beyond in space. The analysis intends to be factual, to bring common hypothesis on which we can lean on to carry out the transformations. Thus this work would like to be independent of who is making the propositions.

Most of the hypothesis mainly come from Master of Science and PhD level Engineering University background. They have been thoroughly worked and verified, even if the effort to trace the sources has not been made systematically (notably because of the urgency of the COP/IPCC alerts asking us to quickly invent solutions; and this work is done entirely voluntarily on free time... therefore not very important in terms of available quantity). If no error, these hypothesis should be today part of the human species world knowledge.

The internet hyperlinks in the text may sometimes lead to specific scientific sources, but some other times they may just be shortcuts to open Wikipedia, as an invitation to start your own search for a word or a proposition of this site which you may have never heard, and immediately get a whole set of sources which will allow you to complete your understanding (a proposition for the long run: Wikipedia could be bougt by governements and put under responsibilities of National Scientific Centers so that this open encyclopedia got a real status of entry point towards scientific knowledge).

The proposed anticipations are elementary projections of phenomenon and capacities which permanence seems confirmed.

​

​

By the way, a general remark for academic research:
 

A problem can be well posed and a solution proposed to this problem

rigorously demonstrated from a scientific point of view, without reference to any scientific source.
 

For example, posing and proving the Pythagorean theorem can be done by "anyone" without any reference; and the intellectual exercise will make all the more progress and will be all the more rewarding for a person, if she/he actually succeeds in doing it on her/his own, rather than reading references on the subject.

Citing your sources is therefore not a way of “validating the fact that an approach is scientific”. It responds to a need to position a proposal in the current state of knowledge, to identify how the work makes a new contribution or not, the objective of academic research being to advance the content of knowledge (as a matter of fact, it brings nothing to Mathematics today to reprove the Pythagorean theorem... and to browse references will allow researchers, especially the youngest, to arrive quickly "on the knowledge front", rather than spending a lot of time re-demonstrating how all the wheels roll).
 

But this Manifesto does not seek to respond to an academic need, to see how its proposals overlap, exhaustively or not, with all the prior arguments and what new contribution it makes; it’s not trying to be some sort of exclusive.

​

Thus, the analyzes of this Manifesto overlap with a huge number of demonstrations and notions already proposed in History (socialism, Maslow's pyramid, Malthusianism, etc.), and in a sense, fortunately, because it addresses the same problem of inventing the most harmonious organization possible for:

​

The human species who will ACT and HAVE in a FINITE BIOSPHERE.
 

The problem is posed, without any double meaning to be sought in this sentence, everyone from 7 years old to 99 years old can understand it, work on it, without sources, without allusion to previous theories; just as living beings come to life spontaneously; just as a 10-year-old child could live happily, “spontaneously and with common sense”, without having to digest the entire journey of the human species. A bit like 1+1=2.
 

The approach seeks to have a popularized language, "obvious" and understandable by all, with extremely simple formulations, unambiguous words, precisely avoiding allusions to existing concepts or theories, which may be complicated, which would already have more or fewer followers, and which can sometimes be linked to major conflicts in History which chill more than one person before even starting the discussion.

The overall objective of the Manifesto is to offer support accessible to all to invent a new organizational model, a simple “system”, explicit for a majority, which would allow a spontaneous escape from the divergence and blindness of the “Monopoly game”, as if it was trivial...

​

​

Eventually this website do not pretend to be all correct. It continues to evolve regularly based on feedbacks and on the evolution of the understanding of the issues addressed therein. It is therefore possible that you will not find exactly the same content each time you come back to it, knowing that normally, if the part you are reading has changed, it should be better worded or have been enriched with more information on the topic.